case law Case law is law that is based on judicial decisions fairly than legislation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case law concerns distinctive disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case law, also used interchangeably with common law , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or matter.
How much sway case law holds may vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances with the current case. To examine this concept, look at the following case legislation definition.
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then find further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as a vital alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and efficiently.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents with the boy or Woman never approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they could do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-set up proposition of get more info law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is from the very clear negation of the legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
ten. Based over the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition will not be considered maintainable and is also therefore liable for being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Since the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, aside from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. In addition it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.